- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 779.CBTPB vs i9 CRI
Facom 779.CBTPB vs Ledlenser i9 CRI
What 779.CBTPB does better (3) and where i9 CRI wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is 779.CBTPB better than i9 CRI?
- Maximum runtime51 h vs 25 h2×
- Weight176 g vs 312 g+77%
- Maximum output309 lm vs 300 lm+3%
Why is i9 CRI better than 779.CBTPB?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)233 m vs 240 m+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 309 lm | 300 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 233 m | 240 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Colour temperature | — | 4,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | C |
| Number of batteries | — | 2 |
| Maximum runtime | 51 h | 25 h |
| Rechargeable | No | No |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 187 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 39 mm |
| Weight | 176 g | 312 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | Black |
