- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 779.CBTPB vs P5R
Facom 779.CBTPB vs Ledlenser P5R
What 779.CBTPB does better (2) and where P5R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is 779.CBTPB better than P5R?
- Maximum runtime51 h vs 25 h2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)233 m vs 165 m+41%
Why is P5R better than 779.CBTPB?
- Weight176 g vs 124 g+42%
- Maximum output309 lm vs 320 lm+4%
- RechargeableNo · 779.CBTPB: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 309 lm | 320 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 233 m | 165 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Maximum runtime | 51 h | 25 h |
| Rechargeable | No | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 130 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 22 mm |
| Weight | 176 g | 124 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | Black |
