How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. 779.CBTPB vs P6R Core QC

Facom 779.CBTPB vs Ledlenser P6R Core QC

What 779.CBTPB does better (1) and where P6R Core QC wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Facom 779.CBTPB
Facom · 2019779.CBTPB
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $70
vs
Ledlenser P6R Core QC
Ledlenser · 2020P6R Core QC
5.0Score
3 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
4.2Brightness & throw5.5
4.2Battery & charging5.1
3.7Build & durability2.7

Why is 779.CBTPB better than P6R Core QC?

  1. Maximum output309 lm vs 270 lm+14%

Why is P6R Core QC better than 779.CBTPB?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)233 m vs 399 m+71%
  2. Maximum runtime51 h vs 120 h2.4×
  3. RechargeableNo · 779.CBTPB: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Facom 779.CBTPBFacom 779.CBTPB≈ $704.5
Light output
Maximum output309 lm270 lm
Peak beam intensity—39,800 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)233 m399 m
Light sourceLEDLED
Adjustable focus (zoom)—Yes
LED & beam
Number of LEDs—1
Colour rendering (CRI)—80
Battery & charging
BatteryAAABuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Number of batteries—1
Maximum runtime51 h120 h
RechargeableNoYes
USB-C charging—No
Charging time—5 h
Battery level indicator—Yes
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP54
Water protection (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Body material—Aluminium
Size & weight
Length / height—163 mm
Head diameter / width—42 mm
Weight176 g—
Modes & features
Switch—Rotary / scroll wheel
Strobe—Yes
Red light—Yes
Green / blue / RGB light—Yes
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare