- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK11 TAC vs Angel Eyes E200
Fenix TK11 TAC vs RovyVon Angel Eyes E200
What TK11 TAC does better (2) and where Angel Eyes E200 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.3Brightness & throw3.4
4.1Battery & charging5.4
8.5Build & durability7.8
2.6Light quality4.0
5.9Features5.9
Why is TK11 TAC better than Angel Eyes E200?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)335 m vs 118 m2.8×
- Peak beam intensity28,060 cd vs 3,480 cd8.1×
Why is Angel Eyes E200 better than TK11 TAC?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 1,650 lm+3%
- Brightness levels3 vs 4+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,650 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 28,060 cd | 3,480 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 335 m | 118 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 47 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 47.5 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 0.8 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 140 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 23.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 114 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | 4 |
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
