How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TK35 vs Freyr

Fenix TK35 vs Olight Freyr

What TK35 does better (1) and where Freyr wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Fenix TK35
Fenix · 2018TK35
6.7Score
1 advantage≈ $110
vs
Olight Freyr
Olight · 2021Freyr
9.6Score
2 advantages≈ $130
Higher score
7.3Brightness & throw6.9
6.5Battery & charging9.6
3.7Build & durability8.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

TK35Freyr
48 × 159.54340 × 136
TK35FreyrDifference
Length / height159.5 mm136 mm+23.5 mm
Head diameter / width48 mm40 mm+8 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TK35 better than Freyr?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)480 m vs 360 m+33%

Why is Freyr better than TK35?

  1. Maximum output1,300 lm vs 1,750 lm+35%
  2. Maximum runtime235 h vs 360 h+53%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix TK35Fenix TK35≈ $1106.7
Olight FreyrOlight Freyr≈ $1309.6
Light output
Maximum output1,300 lm1,750 lm
Peak beam intensity57,600 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)480 m360 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XHP35 HI—
LED makerCree—
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ion, AAABuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Maximum runtime235 h360 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingNo—
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Body material—Aluminium
Size & weight
Length / height159.5 mm136 mm
Head diameter / width48 mm40 mm
Body diameter / depth43 mm—
Weight272 g—
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SwitchDual switches—
StrobeYes—
SOS / beaconYes—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare