How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Shark vs Spider

Oceama Shark vs Oceama Spider

What Shark does better (1) and where Spider wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Oceama Shark
Oceama · 2024Shark
8.4Score
1 advantage≈ $260
Higher score
vs
Oceama Spider
Oceama · 2024Spider
7.3Score
1 advantage≈ $200
4.3Battery & charging7.2
3.1Build & durability3.7
5.9Features5.9

Why is Shark better than Spider?

  1. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+25%

Why is Spider better than Shark?

  1. Weight496 g vs 460 g+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Oceama SharkOceama Shark≈ $2608.4
Oceama SpiderOceama Spider≈ $2007.3
Light output
Maximum output2,500 lm—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XHP50.2Cree XM-L
LED makerCreeCree
Battery & charging
Battery26650 Li-ionBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Battery capacity5,000 mAh4,000 mAh
Maximum runtime1.5 h—
RechargeableYesYes
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Submersible to100 m100 m
Body materialAluminium—
Size & weight
Length / height200 mm180 mm
Weight496 g460 g
Modes & features
Strobe—Yes
SOS / beaconYesYes
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare