How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#catalog1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Flashlights
  3. Fenix UC52
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Fenix UC52

10 flashlights at a similar price that compete with the UC52 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Fenix UC52
Fenix · 2018
UC52
3,100 lm253 mAAA275 g
approx. price≈ $150
6.9

Alternatives to the UC52

Fenix TK35UE Fenix
1
Fenix · 2018TK35UE Fenix
7.8
7% cheaper ≈ $140
  • Maximum runtime 152 h vs 82.5 h
  • Beam distance (ANSI FL1) 300 m vs 253 m
  • Peak beam intensity 22,500 cd vs 16,000 cd
  • Weight 286 g vs 275 g
RovyVon Angel Eyes E700S
2
RovyVon · 2020Angel Eyes E700S
8.9
13% cheaper ≈ $130
  • USB-C charging
  • Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 3,500 mAh
  • Maximum output 2,800 lm vs 3,100 lm
Nitecore CI7
3
Nitecore · 2020CI7
8.9
21% cheaper ≈ $120
  • Maximum output 2,500 lm vs 3,100 lm
Fenix TK26R
4
Fenix · 2019TK26R
6.8
13% cheaper ≈ $130
  • USB-C charging
  • Peak beam intensity 30,620 cd vs 16,000 cd
  • Beam distance (ANSI FL1) 350 m vs 253 m
  • Maximum output 1,500 lm vs 3,100 lm
  • Brightness levels 4 vs 5
Fenix TK35UE V2.0
5
Fenix · 2021TK35UE V2.0
8.6
7% cheaper ≈ $140
  • Peak beam intensity 40,000 cd vs 16,000 cd
  • Maximum output 5,000 lm vs 3,100 lm
  • Beam distance (ANSI FL1) 400 m vs 253 m
Ledlenser P7R Signature
6
Ledlenser · 2020P7R Signature
8.0
27% pricier ≈ $190
  • Weight 131 g vs 275 g
  • USB-C charging
  • Beam distance (ANSI FL1) 330 m vs 253 m
  • Maximum output 2,500 lm vs 3,100 lm
Fenix PD40R V2.0
7
Fenix · 2020PD40R V2.0
7.4
20% cheaper ≈ $120
  • Peak beam intensity 41,010 cd vs 16,000 cd
  • Weight 116 g vs 275 g
  • Beam distance (ANSI FL1) 405 m vs 253 m
  • Maximum output 3,000 lm vs 3,100 lm
  • Brightness levels 4 vs 5
Fenix HT18
8
Fenix · 2019HT18
7.0
13% cheaper ≈ $130
  • Beam distance (ANSI FL1) 925 m vs 253 m
  • Peak beam intensity 213,910 cd vs 16,000 cd
  • Weight 220 g vs 275 g
  • Maximum output 1,500 lm vs 3,100 lm
  • Maximum runtime 61 h vs 82.5 h
Wuben T102
9
Wuben · 2019T102
9.3
40% cheaper ≈ $90
  • USB-C charging
  • Maximum output 3,500 lm vs 3,100 lm
Acebeam EC50 III
10
Acebeam · 2018EC50 III
9.4
  • Maximum runtime 1,200 h vs 82.5 h
  • Weight 120 g vs 275 g
  • Beam distance (ANSI FL1) 326 m vs 253 m
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare